Measuring Relative Mobility of Protein Bands
The term relative mobility refers to the movement
of a type of polypeptide through a gel relative
to other protein bands in the gel. Relative mobility
is the distance migrated by a band divided by
the distance migrated by the dye front. Absolute
mobility would be the distance traveled in a
particular time. Relative mobility is useful
because it can be used to compare the migration
of a protein from gel to gel, regardless of the
physical length of the gel or duration of electrophoresis.
A common abbreviation for relative mobility is
Rf (the f is a subscript), for "retention
factor."
The use of relative mobillity for estimating protein
mass stems from the days when each sample was run
on a separate gel, in tubes rather than on a slab.
Each sample and set of standards had its own dye
front. The migration distance varied from one sample
or set of standards to the next, but as long as
the identical batch of acrylamide gel mix was used
for each tube, the relative mobility of
a given polypeptide was the same for each separate
tube. When multiple samples are run on a slab
gel with standards, it is not necessary to calculate
relative mobility. If one does not need to
compare mobility from one gel to another, it suffices
to measure migration distance only.
Relative mobility of a polypeptide band is
related to its molecular mass.
By running a set of protein standards of known
molecular mass, a standard curve of mass versus
relative mobility can be produced, from which
estimates of apparent mass can
be made for unknown proteins.
If the band is 'fat,' meaning there
is too much protein, either find the same protein
in a smaller quantity in another lane, re-do the
gel with less protein, or estimate the relative
mobility without doing another gel (my first choice,
since the apparent MW is only an estimate anyway).
Students often ask where to measure... middle of
the band? Top of the band?
How gel concentration affects
relative mobility
Each polyacrylamide gel effectively separates proteins
over a specific and limited molecular weight range.
There are two reasons for the limitations. First,
the acrylamide concentration determines the cut-off
at the low end. All polypeptides below a minimum
molecular weight run at the same pace as the tracking
dye. They do not separate from each other, and are
therefore not resolved at all. Second, the relationship
between mass and relative mobility is logarithmic.
Resolution of individual bands tends to diminish
toward the top of a gel, so that with the more dense
gels multiple bands may appear to merge into a single
band. Usually the top 10% or more of a
gel is unusable.
So what happens if you want to characterize all
of the proteins in a sample? ...run more than one
gel, of course! A gel with low density will resolve
the larger polypeptides while cutting off the lighter
ones, and one of higher density will reveal the
smaller polypeptides, while compressing and possibly
distorting the larger ones.
Here are some examples of the effect
of acrylamide concentration on relative mobility.
Molecular weight standards are identified by number.
A typical erythrocyte membrane protein sample is
also presented, with band 3 protein labeled as
a reference.
Standard 1 = myosin (205,000); std.
2 = beta-galactosidase (116,000); std. 3 = phosphorylase
B (92,000); std. 4 = bovine serum albumin (66,000);
std. 5 = egg albumin (45,000); std. 6 = carbonic
anhydrase (29,000).
On the gels from 6 to 10% there is a distinct
dark doublet at the top of the membrane lane. Notice
in the 12% gel the doublet is jammed together and
appears as one band. One could estimate MW of band
3 from the first five gels although the best estimate
comes from the 6%, which produced the greatest
separation between the standards on either side
of band 3. The 12% gel did not resolve bands well
at all above the fourth standard (serum albumin,
66,000). Analysis should be confined to the part
of the gel below 66,000 or even lower if the same
sample was run on a lower density gel.
Frequently, students analyze
the upper part of a high density acrylamide gel
that overlaps part of a lower density gel. That
practice suggests that the student missed the point
of the anaysis and/or did not understand the limitations
of the method.
Interpret only that part of the denser gel that
doesn't overlap the other one. To put it another
way, use high density gels to study proteins (or
parts of proteins) of relatively low molecular
weight, and lower density gels to resolve proteins
of higher molecular weight.
Don't forget that different polypeptides can
have similar or even identical molecular masses.
One band on a gel can therefore consist of one
or more polypeptides. This is most likely to happen
toward the top of a gel, and especially in higher
density gels.
|