Visteon


Mercury CenterThis image allows you to access site resources

SECTIONS
Breaking News
Front Page (Image)
World
National
Local & State
Obituaries
Business & Stocks
Technology
Sports
Arts & Entertainment
Opinion
Weekly Sections
Special Interests
Columnists
Comics
Weather
SV Magazine

CLASSIFIEDS & SERVICES
Classifieds
Careers
Homes
New Homes
Apartments
Mortgage Link
Home Improvement
Home Valuation
Cars
Personals
Yellow Pages
BayArea.com
Entertainment: Just Go
S.F. Bay Traveler
Online Radio
Archives: NewsLibrary
E-mail Dispatches
Contests & Events
 
ABOUT US

 Mercury Center
Advertising Information
Privacy Policy
Site Index

 San Jose Mercury News
Advertising Information
Newspaper Subscription
Mercury News Jobs



Peter K Construction

Medical Weight Management

  Related Links
 Perspective
 Writing Techniques
 Special Reports
 Seven-Day Archives
 Editorial columnists

Opinion

Published Thursday, September 14, 2000, in the San Jose Mercury News

EDITORIAL


The opinion of the Mercury News


Wen Ho Lee's nightmare ends

But questions about prosecution do not

THE case against nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee ended Wednesday with a guilty plea, a sharp rebuke and an extraordinary apology.

Lee accepted the plea, to one felony count of violating national security. Federal District Court Judge James Parker issued the apology and the rebuke.

To Lee, he said: As ``a member of the third branch of the U.S. government, the judiciary, the courts, I sincerely apologize to you . . . for the unfair manner you were held in custody.''

Of top officials of the Department of Justice and the Department of Energy, who were not in court, Parker said, their actions ``have embarrassed our entire nation and each of us who is a citizen of it.''

Parker's comments brought a discreditable trial to a fitting end, and offered some solace to Lee, his family and supporters for his 278 days in solitary confinement. Lee left the court with a felony conviction, but it was clear, from Parker's words, that the government bears shame for his treatment.

The government had targeted Lee, a Taiwan-born employee at the Los Alamos nuclear weapons lab, as the one it suspected of giving away advanced nuclear weapons secrets to China. But it never had any evidence that he committed espionage or that he gave away secrets to China or any nation. Nonetheless, even as its case fell apart, it relentlessly pursued charges that, if they had resulted in conviction, could have led to life imprisonment.

Lee ended up pleading guilty to the unauthorized downloading of nuclear weapons data from a secure computer to an insecure computer -- a violation that Lee has never disputed. In the plea agreement, the government acknowledges Lee's assertion all along that he never intended to harm the United States.

Parker had prodded the government to settle what he recognized was a weak case against Lee. In approving the agreement, Parker implied that more information damaging to the prosecution would have come out in a trial. Lee's lawyers would have presented testimony that Lee had been targeted solely because of his race.

Lee's nightmare is over, but the end of the case should not be the final word. Lee's indictment coincided with a maelstrom over relations with China. Parker's remarkable criticism of the higher-ups at Energy and Justice demands a congressional inquiry into who decided Lee should be prosecuted zealously -- and why. Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, for one, has promised hearings.

A full accounting is vital as a check against future abuses of power.

Return to topThis image allows you to access site resources

Visteon
© 2000 The Mercury News. The information you receive online from The Mercury News is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material. Mercury News privacy policy