Can delamination of lower crust explain the continental crust paradox?

 

The upper continental crust is too evolved (felsic) to be a melt in equilibrium with the mantle (e.g., basalt).  A mafic end-member is required to balance the continental crust composition. One possibility is the lower crust because it is mafic. However, the composition of the average global lower continental crust (Rudnick and Fountain, 1995) is clearly not mafic enough to balance the evolved composition of the continental crust. There is thus a “missing” mafic end-member.  One possibility is that the evidence for this “missing” mafic end-member is eliminated when mafic lithologies (in the form of garnet-pyroxenite), founder and disappear into the convecting mantle (Kay and Kay, 1993; Rudnick, 1995).  Sierra Nevadan garnet-pyroxenites (garnet clinopyroxenites and garnet websterites) may represent a rare snapshot of this mafic component before it foundered.  The average composition of the Sierran garnet-pyroxenites is considerably more mafic than the average global lower continental crust, thus representing a plausible complementary mafic end-member. Rare-earth element patterns of the garnet pyroxenites also appear complementary to those of the Sierran granitoids, suggesting that the pyroxenites are petrogenetically related to the batholith (Ducea, 2001). Removal of Sierran-type pyroxenites would drive the bulk composition of the continental crust towards more evolved compositions, characteristic of the average continental crust. Efforts are underway to better characterize the major- and trace-element composition of garnet pyroxenite xenoliths beneath the Sierra Nevada in order to test this hypothesis.