Bios 318 Peer Evaluation Form

Please enter your name here

Please enter the name of the individual you are evaluating

Please evaluate the effectiveness of each member of your team. Your identity will remain confidential. A conscientious, objective evaluation will reflect well on you and be reflected in your performance score. Evaluations that are clearly unrealistic and/or inconsistent with other students' evaluations of the same person will reflect badly on you, and likewise may affect your course grade.

Poster preparation/presentation

1. What role was assigned to this individual? Check all that apply.

presenter	data analysis	layout	figures
specific section (specify, e.g, methods, introduction, conclusions)
other (specify)

2. Evaluate this individual's contribution to the poster presentation. Check one item.

did not contribute	minor contribution	contribution was adequate
played a major role	indispensable team member

Laboratory work

1. Team effort. Check one item.

did nothing	minor contribution	carried his/her weight
did more than most	clearly the team leader

2. Technical competence - check one item.

hopelessly incompetent	needed lots of help	self reliant
self reliant and helped others	this was the person to go to for help

Overall recommendation for this type of work (check one)

well qualified for a leadership role	qualified for a non-supervisory role
might work out - start with a probationary period	probably not qualified
definitely not qualified

Comments

Please provide comments in the box below. Explanations of high/low ratings with examples will be particularly helpful.

Created by David R. Caprette (caprette@rice.edu), Rice University 30 Apr 09
Copyright and Intended Use